Difference between revisions of "Short-term Performance and Learning Gains Prediction"

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Ogan and colleagues (2015) [[https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8.pdf pdf]]
Ogan et al. (2015) [https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8.pdf pdf]
*Multi-national model predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
*Multi-national model predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
*Both U.S. and combined model performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica
*Both U.S. and combined model performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica

Revision as of 20:44, 17 May 2022

Ogan et al. (2015) pdf

  • Multi-national model predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
  • Both U.S. and combined model performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica
  • U.S. model outperformed for Philippines than when trained with its own data set


Yudelson et al. (2014) pdf

  • Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
  • Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
  • Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students