Difference between revisions of "National Origin or National Location"

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
*Speakers of Arabic and Hindi were given lower scores
*Speakers of Arabic and Hindi were given lower scores
Ogan and colleagues (2015) [[https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8.pdf pdf]]
Ogan and colleagues (2015) [[https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8.pdf pdf]]
*models predicting student learning gains from a mixture of their behaviors related to help-seeking
*Multi-national model predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
*Models built using data from learners in the Philippines, Costa Rica, and the United States were each more accurate on students from their own countries than for students from other countries.
*Both U.S. and combined model performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica  
*U.S. model outperformed for Philippines than when trained with its own data set
Li et al. (2021) [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.15212.pdf pdf]]
Li et al. (2021) [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.15212.pdf pdf]]


* Model predicting student achievement on the standardized examination PISA
* Model predicting student achievement on the standardized examination PISA
* Inaccuracy of the U.S.-trained model was greater for students from countries with lower scores of national development (e.g. Indonesia, Vietnam, Moldova)
* Inaccuracy of the U.S.-trained model was greater for students from countries with lower scores of national development (e.g. Indonesia, Vietnam, Moldova)

Revision as of 05:00, 24 January 2022

Bridgeman, Trapani, and Attali (2009) [pdf]

  • E-Rater system that automatically grades a student’s essay
  • Inaccurately high scores were given to Chinese and Korean students
  • System showed poor correlation for GRE essay scores of Chinese students

Bridgeman, Trapani, and Attali (2012) [pdf]

  • A later version of E-Rater system for automatic grading of GSE essay
  • Chinese students were given higher scores than when graded by human essay raters
  • Speakers of Arabic and Hindi were given lower scores

Ogan and colleagues (2015) [pdf]

  • Multi-national model predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
  • Both U.S. and combined model performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica
  • U.S. model outperformed for Philippines than when trained with its own data set

Li et al. (2021) [pdf]

  • Model predicting student achievement on the standardized examination PISA
  • Inaccuracy of the U.S.-trained model was greater for students from countries with lower scores of national development (e.g. Indonesia, Vietnam, Moldova)