Difference between revisions of "Learners with Disabilities"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Loukina & Buzick (2017) [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ets2.12170 pdf] | |||
* a model (the SpeechRater) automatically scoring open-ended spoken responses for speakers with documented or suspected speech impairments | * a model (the SpeechRater) automatically scoring open-ended spoken responses for speakers with documented or suspected speech impairments | ||
* SpeechRater was less accurate for test takers who were deferred for signs of speech impairment (ρ<sup>2</sup> = .57) than test takers who were given accommodations for documented disabilities (ρ<sup>2</sup> = .73) | * SpeechRater was less accurate for test takers who were deferred for signs of speech impairment (ρ<sup>2</sup> = .57) than test takers who were given accommodations for documented disabilities (ρ<sup>2</sup> = .73) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 8: | ||
* Models predicting course outcome of students in a virtual learning environment (VLE) | * Models predicting course outcome of students in a virtual learning environment (VLE) | ||
* Disparate impact was found for students with self-declared disabilities, with systematic inaccuracies in predictions for learners in this group. | * Disparate impact was found for students with self-declared disabilities, with systematic inaccuracies in predictions for learners in this group. | ||
Permodo et al (2023) [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370001437_Difficult_Lessons_on_Social_Prediction_from_Wisconsin_Public_Schools pdf] | |||
* Paper discusses system that predicts probabilities of on-time graduation | |||
* Prediction is more accurate for students with Disabilities than students without Disabilities | |||
Latest revision as of 21:13, 28 June 2023
Loukina & Buzick (2017) pdf
- a model (the SpeechRater) automatically scoring open-ended spoken responses for speakers with documented or suspected speech impairments
- SpeechRater was less accurate for test takers who were deferred for signs of speech impairment (ρ2 = .57) than test takers who were given accommodations for documented disabilities (ρ2 = .73)
Riazy et al. (2020) pdf
- Models predicting course outcome of students in a virtual learning environment (VLE)
- Disparate impact was found for students with self-declared disabilities, with systematic inaccuracies in predictions for learners in this group.
Permodo et al (2023) pdf
- Paper discusses system that predicts probabilities of on-time graduation
- Prediction is more accurate for students with Disabilities than students without Disabilities