Urbanicity - Revision history

Ryan: detail added

2022-06-10T10:06:56Z

detail added

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:06, 10 June 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system		* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system
			* Data set involved urban, rural, and suburban learners.
	* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)		* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
	* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)		* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)

Seiyon at 12:23, 18 May 2022

2022-05-18T12:23:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 18 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) [[https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf]]		Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) [https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf]

	* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system		* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system
Line 6:		Line 6:


	Samei et al. (2015) [[https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560879.pdf pdf]]		Samei et al. (2015) [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560879.pdf pdf]

	* Models predicting classroom discourse properties (e.g. authenticity and uptake)		* Models predicting classroom discourse properties (e.g. authenticity and uptake)
	* Model trained on urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.60) performed with similar accuracy when tested on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.62)		* Model trained on urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.60) performed with similar accuracy when tested on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.62)
	* Model trained on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.61, uptake: 0.59) performed with similar accuracy when tested on urban students (authenticity: 0.60, uptake: 0.63)		* Model trained on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.61, uptake: 0.59) performed with similar accuracy when tested on urban students (authenticity: 0.60, uptake: 0.63)

Ryan at 16:54, 28 March 2022

2022-03-28T16:54:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 28 March 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* Models predicting classroom discourse properties (e.g. authenticity and uptake)		* Models predicting classroom discourse properties (e.g. authenticity and uptake)
	* Model trained on urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.60) performed with similar accuracy when tested on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.62)		* Model trained on urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.60) performed with similar accuracy when tested on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.62)
	* Model trained on non-urban (authenticity: 0.61, uptake: 0.59) performed with similar accuracy when tested on urban students (authenticity: 0.60, uptake: 0.63)		* Model trained on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.61, uptake: 0.59) performed with similar accuracy when tested on urban students (authenticity: 0.60, uptake: 0.63)

Seiyon at 07:16, 17 February 2022

2022-02-17T07:16:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 17 February 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)		* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
	* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)		* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)


			Samei et al. (2015) [[https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560879.pdf pdf]]

			* Models predicting classroom discourse properties (e.g. authenticity and uptake)
			* Model trained on urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.60) performed with similar accuracy when tested on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.62)
			* Model trained on non-urban (authenticity: 0.61, uptake: 0.59) performed with similar accuracy when tested on urban students (authenticity: 0.60, uptake: 0.63)

Seiyon: Created page with "Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf * Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system * Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52) * Detectors trained..."

2022-02-17T06:56:42Z

Created page with "Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf * Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system * Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52) * Detectors trained..."

New page

Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) [[https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf]]

* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system
* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)