Engagement and Affect Detection - Revision history

Shruti: Addition

2023-10-01T04:38:07Z

Addition

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 1 October 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)		* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
	* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)		* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)
			Chiu (2020) [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267654.pdf pdf]

			* Model identifies affective states (boredom, concentration, confusion, frustration, off task and gaming) of middle school students’ online mathematics learning in predicting their choice to study STEM in higher education.
			* Model detects interaction with the ASSISTments system
			* Model performs better for male students (AUC =0.641 for RFPS; AUC =0.571 for LR) than female students (AUC = 0.492 for RFPS; AUC=0.535 for LR)

Ryan: added detail

2022-06-10T10:09:50Z

added detail

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 10 June 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system		* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system
			* Study involved urban, rural, and suburban learners
	* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)		* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
	* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)		* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)

Seiyon at 12:25, 18 May 2022

2022-05-18T12:25:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 18 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) [[https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf]]		Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) [https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf]

	* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system		* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system
	* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)		* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
	* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)		* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)

Seiyon: Created page with "Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf * Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system * Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52) * Detectors trained..."

2022-02-17T06:56:58Z

Created page with "Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf * Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system * Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52) * Detectors trained..."

New page

Ocumpaugh et al. (2014) [[https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjet.12156 pdf]]

* Models detecting student affective states (boredom, confusion, engaged concentration, frustration) from the interaction with ASSISTment system
* Detectors generally performed the best for the same subpopulation that they were trained on (average kappa = 0.26, A′ = 0.67), and worse for other subpopulations (average kappa = 0.03 and A′ = 0.52)
* Detectors trained on combined population generally performed better for urban and suburban population (kappa = 0.18, 0.16; A′ = 0.62, 0.66) and not as well for rural population (kappa = 0.06; A′ = 0.54)